Opening Gambit: Contingency Plans#
“No plan survives first contact with the enemy.” — Helmuth von Moltke
Every decision point has at least two backup options. We don’t pretend to know what will happen — we prepare for multiple outcomes.
PHASE 0: SETUP#
Decision: When to launch alpha test posts?#
| Option | Trigger | Content |
|---|
| A (Default) | All systems confirmed working | alpha0001-0003 as planned |
| B (Accelerate) | Competitor moves first | Launch immediately, fix in flight |
| C (Delay) | Critical bug discovered | Hold until fixed, private beta instead |
Decision: First 10 recipients selected?#
| Option | Trigger | Action |
|---|
| A (Default) | Mother-in-law selects all 10 | Proceed with onboarding |
| B (Partial) | Only 5-9 identified | Launch with available, continue search |
| C (None ready) | Selection delayed | Founder selects first 3, delegate rest |
PHASE 1: THE OPENING#
Decision Point 1: MacKenzie Scott Letter#
| If Response Is… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| Ignored | Proceed to Buffett at 100 members | Reference Scott publicly as “pending” |
| Polite decline | Thank publicly, ask for referral | Pivot messaging to member success |
| Connection offer | Drop everything, follow up 24h | Create dedicated onboarding path |
| Negative/criticism | Publish response, address directly | Reference Anticipated Criticism docs |
Decision Point 2: Membership Growth Rate#
| If Growth Is… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| Stalled (<50 in 30 days) | Increase First X bonus to 3x | Pivot to geographic focus (one city) |
| Slow (50-100 in 30 days) | Extend Buffett trigger to 150 | Add referral bonus campaign |
| On track (100+ in 30 days) | Proceed as planned | Prepare for Phase 2 acceleration |
| Explosive (500+ in 30 days) | Cap onboarding, quality checks | Activate emergency Harper training |
Decision Point 3: Warren Buffett Letter (at 100 members)#
| If Response Is… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| Ignored | Proceed to The 300 | Reference publicly, proceed |
| Interest expressed | Prioritize investor deck prep | Arrange demo/presentation |
| Delegation to staff | Treat as connection, follow up | Adjust letter for staff audience |
| Criticism | Address publicly, reference papers | Pivot to operator letters first |
Decision Point 4: The 300 Crown Letters#
| If Response Is… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| <10% response rate | Personalize follow-ups | Shift to warm introductions only |
| 10-30% response rate | On track, continue | Add case studies from early wins |
| >30% response rate | Accelerate identification | Create waiting list for overflow |
| Negative backlash | Pause outreach, address concerns | Pivot to grassroots first |
PHASE 2: THE MIDDLEGAME#
Decision Point 5: First Node Application#
| If Application Is… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| Strong candidate | Fast-track Harper review | Document process for replication |
| Weak candidate | Coaching program first | Suggest partnership with stronger operator |
| Multiple applications | Create selection criteria | Geographic diversity priority |
| No applications | Seed first node internally | Partner with existing organization |
Decision Point 6: First Harper Certification#
| If Outcome Is… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| Candidate qualifies | Publicize, celebrate | Begin second candidate pipeline |
| No candidates qualify | Lower thresholds temporarily | Create mentorship track |
| Multiple qualify | Form initial Guild | Create regional assignments |
| Candidate fails | Coaching, retry in 90 days | Adjust selection algorithm |
Decision Point 7: First Initiative Funding (Sweet 16)#
| If Outcome Is… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| Fully funded fast | Launch, document success | Begin second initiative |
| Stuck at 50% | Matching campaign | Simplify scope, reduce target |
| No traction | Pivot to different initiative | Survey members for priorities |
| Over-funded | Expand scope | Bank for future phases |
PHASE 3: THE ENDGAME#
Decision Point 8: Break-Even (500 local members)#
| If Reached… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| On schedule | Celebrate, expand | Document playbook |
| Ahead of schedule | Verify quality metrics | Prepare for scale challenges |
| Behind schedule | Analyze blockers | Geographic pivot |
| Never reached | Merge nodes | Fundamental model review |
Decision Point 9: Profitable (1,000 local members)#
| If Reached… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| Single node profitable | Replicate model | Attract operator candidates |
| Multiple nodes profitable | Begin network effects | Reduce platform subsidies |
| Mixed results | Analyze differences | Standardize successful patterns |
Decision Point 10: Asteroid-Proof Status#
| If Status Is… | Contingency A | Contingency B |
|---|
| Achieved | Document, celebrate | Begin succession planning |
| Partial | Prioritize gaps | Accept temporary manual processes |
| Blocked | Identify blocker | Bring in specialist help |
Positive Coverage#
| If Coverage Is… | Action A | Action B |
|---|
| Local press | Amplify, share | Prepare national pitch |
| National press | All hands for response | Create press kit updates |
| Viral social | Prepared cue cards | Monitor, engage authentically |
Negative Coverage#
| If Coverage Is… | Action A | Action B |
|---|
| MLM accusations | Reference Anticipated Criticism | Publish comparison chart |
| Founder criticism | Transparent response | Let community speak |
| Technical criticism | Fix if valid, explain if not | Invite critic to review |
| Competitor attack | Ignore unless factual errors | Highlight differentiation |
ECONOMIC CONTINGENCIES#
MARKS Economy Issues#
| If Issue Is… | Action A | Action B |
|---|
| Low circulation | Increase earning opportunities | Reduce spending requirements |
| Inflation | Tighten issuance | Add sinks (spending uses) |
| Hoarding | Add holding costs | Increase velocity incentives |
Joule Issues#
| If Issue Is… | Action A | Action B |
|---|
| Mass redemption | Honor commitments, adjust rate | Add redemption cooldown |
| No redemption | Good — value is growing | Create redemption incentives |
IMPLEMENTATION#
Display on Cephas#
Each decision point links to:
- Full contingency details (this page)
- Anticipated Criticism reference (if applicable)
- Related innovations
- Current status indicator
Flowchart Visualization#
See Opening Gambit Flowchart for interactive visualization.
Public Transparency#
All contingencies are published. We hide nothing. This is building in public.
CROSS-REFERENCES#
“We don’t predict the future. We prepare for multiple futures.”