Anticipated Criticism Index

We’ve thought about what you might say. Here are our answers.

Philosophy

We anticipate criticism before it arrives. Not to deflect, but to demonstrate:

1. We’ve thought about it — Serious objections deserve serious consideration
2. We have answers — Not dismissals, but explanations
3. Transparency — Hide nothing, address everything
4. Good faith — Assume critics want to understand, not just attack

Master Criticism Categories

Economic Critiques

Governance Critiques

Technical Critiques

Ideological Critiques

Personal Critiques

Document Locations

Primary Document

Supporting Documents

Cross-References

In Crown Letters

Every Crown Letter should reference:

“We’ve anticipated your concerns. See Anticipated Critiques for our pre-written responses.”

In Academic Papers

Every academic paper should include:

“For anticipated objections and responses, see the platform’s Anticipated Criticism documentation.”

In Press Materials

Press kit should include:

“FAQ and Anticipated Criticism responses available at [link]”

Adding New Criticisms

When to Add

• New criticism appears in feedback
• New criticism anticipated from industry changes
• Legal/regulatory landscape shifts
• Competitor actions raise questions

Process

1. Document the criticism exactly as stated
2. Draft good-faith response
3. Link to supporting documentation
4. Add to appropriate category
5. Update this index

Related Documents

“We’ve thought about what you might say. Now let’s talk about what we’re actually doing.”

For the Keep.